Affiliate Disclosure

A site about gambling that will not say who pays for it is asking to be distrusted. So: alphawin.biz earns money through a partner programme. Some links leading to the operator carry a parameter identifying this domain as the source of the visit, and if a reader opens an account after following one, this site may receive a commission. That is the whole model, and everything below is detail about how it works and where its limits sit.

What it costs the reader

Nothing. A partner link and a link typed by hand lead to the same place under the same conditions. No bonus is smaller, no minimum is higher and no processing time is longer for having arrived from here. The commission is paid by the partner programme out of its own marketing budget, not added to anything a reader pays.

What the link actually transmits

The parameter identifies the source of the visit, not the visitor. This site does not receive a name, an account number, a balance, a stake history or any document a reader submits to the operator. Reporting arrives as aggregate counts. What the operator itself collects once an account exists is governed by the operator's own privacy notice; what this site records is described in the privacy notice here.

The rule that keeps this workable

One sentence: the commercial arrangement decides whether a link exists, never what an assessment says. The practical test of that rule is whether unflattering things get published. On this site they do — the first withdrawal held until identity verification completes, turnover wording that needs to be calculated before accepting, categories of game that do not count towards a bonus, the extra step created by a cashier displaying euro instead of lev during the transition. A site that only publishes strengths is a brochure with a disclosure page attached.

What is not for sale

• Positions in a list or an assessment. There is no paid placement here.
• Removal of a weakness from a page. A real problem stays written down.
• Statements about legality. Those resolve at the public register of licensed organisers kept by the National Revenue Agency, and no commercial arrangement can move an entry in it.
• Invented player testimonials. This site publishes none, in either language.

Why the register keeps being mentioned

Because it is the one check a reader can perform without trusting this site at all. Supervision of gambling in Bulgaria passed from the abolished State Commission on Gambling to the National Revenue Agency, which maintains both the register of licensed organisers and a list of blocked internet pages. Whether a permit exists, whether it is active and which domains it covers are all answered there in a minute. Any publisher, funded or not, is downstream of that.

Independence in practice

alphawin.biz is not the operator and is not affiliated with it. It cannot open an account, release a payment, restore a bonus or intervene in a dispute — the honest limits are set out on the complaints page. What it can do is explain a rule, show where it is published and describe how a procedure normally runs. The editorial approach in full is described in about this reference desk, and the analyst behind the pages is Martina Peneva.

A note on responsibility

Being funded by referrals creates an obvious pull towards encouraging people to sign up. The counterweight is stated plainly: nothing here tells a reader to gamble, no page promises an outcome, and the material on staying in control is written with the same care as the material on bonuses. Readers under 18 are outside the audience of this site entirely.